WORKSHOP AGENDA ] ] ] ] ] ] ] WORKSHOP SUMMARY ] ] ] ] ] ] ]PRESENTATIONS
Climate Change Mitigation Projects in India; Methodology Workshop
Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
July 10 – 12, 2003
Indian Institute of Science
Indian Council for Forestry Research and Education
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Ministry of Environment and Forests
Summary Report of the Workshop
The India-USA "FORCLIMIT-INDIA" collaborative project has been initiated with the following objectives:
- Improved assessment of incremental mitigation opportunities and potential at national level
- Detained assessment of mitigation opportunities and potential costs and benefits in two selected states namely Karnataka and Uttaranchal
- Two comparable case studies of mitigation potential, at the district scale to explore mitigation opportunities and barriers, and technical issues regarding methods and institutional arrangements to assess community and farm forestry (industry)
- Initiate dialog by government, private, NGO, academic and local stakeholders on technical issues and disseminate findings through workshops, meetings and publications and/or web sites.
A methodology workshop was organized at the Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore between 10th – 12th July 2003 that was attended by academicians, industrialists, NGOs, researchers and Forest Department functionaries.
The objective of the methodology workshop was as follows:
- Improved assessment of mitigation opportunities and estimates of incremental mitigation, potential and cost-effectiveness at different levels - national, state and case studies
- To address methodological issues in project development, implementation & monitoring
- To disseminate methods, models and initiate dialogue
- To discuss methodological issues in project (proposal) development and monitoring:
- To discuss methods for field studies and estimation of carbon stock changes
- To explore and use PRO-COMAP models for projecting carbon benefits and costs / benefits
- To prepare a plan for field studies, analysis, modeling, reporting and disseminating workshops
The outcome of the workshop were:
- Worked out modalities for the project and identified issues that needs to be addressed
- Charted plan of work for the project
- Identified selection criteria for case-study project
The details of the outcome are as follows:
Outcome 1:Work Plan Observations
A range of actual and potential project types were discussed, and agreed to conduct project case studies in 2 States; Karnataka and Uttaranchal
Project types could include JFM, Community or farm forestry and industry contracts with farmers
Agreed to conduct improved state level assessment of mitigation opportunities, potential costs and benefits
Share technical papers, case studies, etc. on the web site, and exchange project staff.
Baseline setting is a key issue for projects, and will require projecting land use & land use change over time.
India may need to develop Good Practices for forestry projects for carbon sequestration
PRO-COMAP model may need improved project management financial analysis capabilities like typical investment model (to add timing of revenue flows) and ensure representation of carbon stock in products.
Improved PRO-COMAP model will be put up on the web site by end of August.
Outcome 2: Plan of work ‘FORCLIMIT INDIA’ Project
|
July 10-12 |
Training Workshop |
- Field methods
- Modeling
- Plan of work
|
|
July 14-Aug 10 |
Site selection |
|
|
Aug 10-Sept 30 |
Project case study; Field study and data collection
- Community forestry case study
- Industry-farmers cooperative venture
|
Select a forest division, range, cluster of villages
Identifying project boundary
Identifying project activities and areas
Sampling strategy
Develop baseline scenario C-stock
Conduct field studies
Lab analysis of soil carbon
Estimating potential leakage
Project net carbon benefit
Assessing cost-effectiveness ($/tC) and investment cost
Developing institutional structure
ICFRE & IISc+FD
|
|
Sept 30-Oct 10 |
Project case study; Analysis and report preparation |
- PROCOMAP analysis
- Project report preparation
- ICFRE & IISc + Forest dept.
|
|
Sep 1-Sept 30 |
State level Mitigation potential assessment in Uttaranchal and Karnataka |
- Data gathering
- Field studies on biomass and soil carbon in selected divisions
- ICFRE & IISc+FD
|
|
National level Mitigation potential assessment |
- Data gathering
- IISc+ICFRE
|
|
October 15-Nov 10 |
State & National level mitigation potential assessment |
- PROCOMAP analysis
- Report preparation
- IISc & ICFRE
|
|
November 10-15 |
Meeting in Delhi- Before COP-9 |
- Present preliminary results
|
|
January, 2004 |
National Seminar/Workshop |
|
Outcome 3: FORCLIMIT-India: Potential Project Selection Criteria
The selection criteria for implementing the project at a district level for project case studies (JFM Case: Forest Dept land and community land; Private contract case: farm land) were decided on the following lines.
Biophysical Criteria
Low baseline C in project area
Data availability
Potential high Carbon gain in project
5-10,000 ha eligible land for wasteland, farm land, forest land with less than 10% crown cover, Adequate precipitation & seasonality
Programmatic Criteria
Meets the definition of forests
Meets the definition of Afforestation or Reforestation under Marrakech Accord
Provides Additionality:
- regulatory or institutional
- GHG benefits
- financial
Meets Sustainable Development Criteria
Provides socio-economic and environmental benefits
Has Presumably low leakage
Ability to identify baseline